Letter from Rupert Sheldrake on October 24
“Dear Zaquie, Many thanks for your interesting email and for your reflections on them. Certainly the third test worked a lot better. Do you think that the main difference was the rest period between each trial? I would be happy if you could continue with these tests and see how the scores go under these improved conditions, and also if you can identify people who are unusually good at looking and who are unusually sensitive as subjects. It would be interesting to know just how well people can do in these tests under ideal conditions. Most people only do a single test and take it no further. With best wishes.”
Posts recentes
Ver tudo“Dear Zaquie, Thanks for this new update. I’m glad you’re going on with this research and looking at who seems more ‘strong minded’. I suspect that in the real world this is what makes the most differ
“Dear Rupert Sheldrake, saudações and saludos! I hope everything is fine with you. I want to report some of the results of our tests. There were 2 groups: An entire new group which we didnt know who w
“Dear Zaquie Thanks for this feedback. It would be good to test the sensitive and strong people both ways round so I hope you can continue this in your next meeting. All the best Rupert”